========================================= Compressed sensing using forward-backward ========================================= This tutorial presents a `compressed sensing `_ problem solved by the forward-backward splitting algorithm. The convex optimization problem is the sum of a data fidelity term and a regularization term which expresses a prior on the sparsity of the solution, given by .. math:: \min\limits_x \|Ax-y\|_2^2 + \tau \|x\|_1 where `y` are the measurements, `A` is the measurement matrix and :math:`\tau` expresses the trade-off between the two terms. The number of necessary measurements `m` is computed with respect to the signal size `n` and the sparsity level `S` in order to very often perform a perfect reconstruction. See :cite:`candes2007CSperfect` for details. .. plot:: :context: reset >>> n = 5000 >>> S = 100 >>> import numpy as np >>> m = int(np.ceil(S * np.log(n))) >>> print('Number of measurements: {}'.format(m)) Number of measurements: 852 >>> print('Compression ratio: {:3.2f}'.format(float(n) / m)) Compression ratio: 5.87 We generate a random measurement matrix `A`: .. plot:: :context: >>> np.random.seed(1) # Reproducible results. >>> A = np.random.normal(size=(m, n)) Create the `S` sparse signal `x`: .. plot:: :context: >>> x = np.zeros(n) >>> I = np.random.permutation(n) >>> x[I[0:S]] = np.random.normal(size=S) >>> x = x / np.linalg.norm(x) Generate the measured signal `y`: .. plot:: :context: >>> y = np.dot(A, x) The prior objective to minimize is defined by .. math:: f_1(x) = \tau \|x\|_1 which can be expressed by the toolbox L1-norm function object. It can be instantiated as follows, while setting the regularization parameter `tau`: .. plot:: :context: >>> from pyunlocbox import functions >>> tau = 1.0 >>> f1 = functions.norm_l1(lambda_=tau) The fidelity objective to minimize is defined by .. math:: f_2(x) = \|Ax-y\|_2^2 which can be expressed by the toolbox L2-norm function object. It can be instantiated as follows: .. plot:: :context: >>> f2 = functions.norm_l2(y=y, A=A) or alternatively as follows: .. plot:: :context: >>> f3 = functions.norm_l2(y=y) >>> f3.A = lambda x: np.dot(A, x) >>> f3.At = lambda x: np.dot(A.T, x) .. note:: In this case the forward and adjoint operators were passed as functions not as matrices. A third alternative would be to define the function object by hand: .. plot:: :context: >>> f4 = functions.func() >>> f4._grad = lambda x: 2.0 * np.dot(A.T, np.dot(A, x) - y) >>> f4._eval = lambda x: np.linalg.norm(np.dot(A, x) - y)**2 .. note:: The three alternatives to instantiate the function objects (`f2`, `f3` and `f4`) are strictly equivalent and give the exact same results. Now that the two function objects to minimize (the L1-norm and the L2-norm) are instantiated, we can instantiate the solver object. The step size for optimal convergence is :math:`\frac{1}{\beta}` where :math:`\beta` is the Lipschitz constant of the gradient of `f2`, `f3`, `f4` given by: .. math:: \beta = 2 \cdot \|A\|_{\text{op}}^2 = 2 \cdot \lambda_{max} (A^*A). To solve this problem, we use the Forward-Backward splitting algorithm which is instantiated as follows: .. plot:: :context: >>> step = 0.5 / np.linalg.norm(A, ord=2)**2 >>> from pyunlocbox import solvers >>> solver = solvers.forward_backward(step=step) .. note:: A complete description of the constructor parameters and default values is given by the solver object :class:`pyunlocbox.solvers.forward_backward` reference documentation. After the instantiations of the functions and solver objects, the setting of a starting point `x0`, the problem is solved by the toolbox solving function as follows: .. plot:: :context: >>> x0 = np.zeros(n) >>> ret = solvers.solve([f1, f2], x0, solver, rtol=1e-4, maxit=300) Solution found after 151 iterations: objective function f(sol) = 7.668167e+00 stopping criterion: RTOL .. note:: A complete description of the parameters, their default values and the returned values is given by the solving function :func:`pyunlocbox.solvers.solve` reference documentation. Let's display the results: .. plot:: :context: >>> import matplotlib.pyplot as plt >>> _ = plt.figure() >>> _ = plt.plot(x, 'o', label='Original') >>> _ = plt.plot(ret['sol'], 'xr', label='Reconstructed') >>> _ = plt.grid(True) >>> _ = plt.title('Achieved reconstruction') >>> _ = plt.legend(numpoints=1) >>> _ = plt.xlabel('Signal dimension number') >>> _ = plt.ylabel('Signal value') The above figure shows a good reconstruction which is both sparse (thanks to the L1-norm objective) and close to the measurements (thanks to the L2-norm objective). Let's display the convergence of the two objective functions: .. plot:: :context: close-figs >>> objective = np.array(ret['objective']) >>> _ = plt.figure() >>> _ = plt.semilogy(objective[:, 0], label='L1-norm objective') >>> _ = plt.semilogy(objective[:, 1], label='L2-norm objective') >>> _ = plt.semilogy(np.sum(objective, axis=1), label='Global objective') >>> _ = plt.grid(True) >>> _ = plt.title('Convergence') >>> _ = plt.legend() >>> _ = plt.xlabel('Iteration number') >>> _ = plt.ylabel('Objective function value')